A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national notice subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their family members house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying produced by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted less than preparing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially constructed, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their perspective, an allegation that's been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal arranging disputes, where views of The ocean are both equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable endeavours from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to Assemble visual proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Instances noted, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated in detail via the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read more submissions on no matter if interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is a disagreement in excess of boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to Paul Feely accountant scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are actually carried out depending on Qualified information and permitted options. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a scenario that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.